To schedule a demonstration, call 1-800-998-4874

Cavo Comments

Cavo eD is proud to provide leading analysis from our in house experts on topical cases, industry practices and new technologies for your use.
We also link to a variety of other thought leaders in the field to further provide important information.

Defensible eDiscovery Should be Planned and Executed with Clear Defensible Strategies Before You Begin the Process

In September of 2016, the Sedona Conference released Commentary on Defense of Process: Principles and Guidelines for Developing and Implementing a Sound E-Discovery Process, for public comment.  The purpose of the commentary, defensible ediscovery,  is to set forth general guidance to help parties and the courts deal with the growing complexity of eDiscovery.  The goal […]

Defensible Custodian Self-Collection is Possible, But it is Not Easy

    Many corporate counsels repeatedly express concern that eDiscovery identification, collection and preservation are extremely costly, time consuming and overly burdensome.  And to add to these concerns that courts continue to issue punitive sanctions for improperly executed ESI preservation. Is self collection the answer?  Given that the volume of ESI continues to expand, alternative approaches […]

Why is eDiscovery Competence Important?…Because you Might be Sanctioned, Heavily

  Intro I firmly believe that if you don’t have a particular expertise needed to do your job correctly, that it is better to find someone that does, rather than try to learn on the fly.  The most successful people that I know surround themselves with people that have expertise that they don’t possess.  This […]

What Makes a “Successful” Meet and Confer– Rule 26(f)

    Everyone involved in discovery has read the FRCP at least once, but the question is how much of the detail has driven decisions that get made every day by litigators? Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires attorneys to participate in a conference to discuss, among other things, a discovery […]

No, There is No Legal Requirement that You Read Every Document

Intro There are still many lawyers who believe that they are not doing their job if they don’t read every email, document, spreadsheet, video and all other ESI that gets produced during discovery.  In fact, the opposite is true.  Courts are pushing the idea that you need to use technology to help you get to […]

What is Needed to Make eDiscovery Work in Your Favor? Skills and Principles to Consider

As a non-attorney in a field dominated by lawyers, I have had to work extra hard to have a voice in the legal industry.  An early focus on discovery rules and principles that was then adapted to the “new” field of eDiscovery has provided me with a level of expertise that allows me to speak […]

eDiscovery is Just Like any Other Business Process: It Needs to be Managed, Measured, and Optimized

        This is a second in a series of blog presentations about the need to apply business principles, particularly Business Process Management to eDiscovery Processes (Click here for related article).  Again the legal profession appears to be somewhat late to the party recognizing the need for and defining the linkage between people, […]

Relevance Not Enough under Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure – Implementation of 26(b)

In Noble Roman’s, Inc. v. Hattenhauer Distrib. Co., No. 1:14-cv-01734-WTL-DML, 2016 WL 1162553 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 24, 2016), the court recently ruled that relying solely on relevance was not enough to force Plaintiff to turn over request information.  The Plaintiff’s motion for a protection order was granted and the Defendant is prohibited from obtaining the […]

FRCP New Rules Update Rule 26(b)(1)

As part of my ongoing coverage of the recently amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and their impact on the practice of eDiscovery, a recent ruling should be of interest to all those involved in the practice of eDiscovery.  Amendments to FRCP 26(b)(1) focuses on the reasonable limits that can and should be placed […]

What Will 2015 Likely Mean for eDiscovery? – Some Things to Watch For

Given that the law generally moves at a constant rate of speed, far too slowly for this technology specialist, I am not predicting any radical changes in either eDiscovery Tools or adoption rates of existing technology. But since adoption is on a continuum, certain things will begin to pick up momentum since they are no […]